IELTS Mock Test 2022 July Writing Practice Test 1
Question list
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic.
Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.

Comments:
Increased blood pressure, higher risk of cardiovascular disease and subsequently improved chance of early death are just a few dangers of pediatric obesity. Surely no one wants to succumb to such fate, but who is to blame? While some people point their fingers at the patients themselves, the government actually plays a significant role here.
First of all, even though eating healthy food is the perfect counter against obesity caused by unbalanced diet, the government regulations are not supportive enough. Fresh, nutritious ingredients are often pricier than their instant counterparts, naturally pushing people to purchase more heavily processed goods containing many additives to feed their kids. Not to mention that youngsters are believed to have better metabolism, in contrast to obesity which is widely known as old people disease within the society. As a result, people do not give much thought about the probability of obesity incidence in children. Parents are not aware about the threat of obesity among their offsprings due to lack of education from the government.
Furthermore, considering that lack of exercise could also lead to obesity, school curricula designed by the government adds more chaos to this havoc. Students' timetables are packed by long indoor classes with little to no sport lessons. In Indonesia, for example, schoolkids only get roughly one hour of physical education class weekly. As a consequence of this unhealthy lifestyle, the poorly exercised kids are more prone to developing obesity.
Unstrategic pricing of healthy food, minimal socialization, and reduced sport classes for kids are some examples to highlight that the government does play a part in the improved cases of children obesity.
https://ieltsonlinetests.com/wot/result/writing-practice-test-1-768699
The provided pie charts illustrate the proportion of waste treatment methods used in three different countries. At a glance, burying garbage underground seems to be the trend in two countries, except in Korea where trashes are being recycled. Destroying waste by fire is the last option in all countries.
Looking in deeper detail, Sweden and Korea share the same choices of handling their garbage, though the division of waste handled varies. In Sweden, more than half of the waste is being buried underground, compared to merely 22% in Korea. Recycling and incineration is almost equal at a quarter and a fifth, respectively, while almost 70% of the waste in Korea is recycled and less than a tenth is burned.
UK, on the other hand, has another options for waste handling that are not present in two previous jurisdictions: chemical treatment and dumping at the sea, each covers 8% of the total garbage. Burying trash underground is even more popular here than in Sweden by nearly 30%, while incineration is the least common at just 2%.
The circular charts illustrate the detrimental effect of garbage disposal in Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Overall, the most common waste disposal is underground and incineration processes in all three countries of comparison.
However, only United Kingdom has the chemical treatment and dumping at sea method of disposal and no recycling procedurein this country.
Initially, the most known method of waste disposal is an underground process, where figures are 22%, 55%, and 82% in
Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, respectively, and the most commonly used procedure in the United Kingdom.
Incineration, a procedure that burned waste thru fire has a higher proportion of 20% in Sweden,
9% in the Republic of Korea, and least in the United Kingdom with 2% in number. The recycling process is only popular in the Republic of Korea and
Sweden with 69% and 25%, respectively. Solely, the United Kingdom does not use the recycling method, however, this country has
another method of disposing of its garbage, which has the same total percentage of 8% for chemical treatment and dumping at sea
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of how the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom disposes of hazardous waste.
Overall, the Republic of Korea and Sweden use the same method to eliminate garbage, while the United Kingdom has more ways of dealing with litter.
Recycling is the Republic of Korea's most used procedure, accounting for 69%, while only a quarter happens in Sweden. However, over half of all dangerous litter is buried underground in Sweden, whereas it is the second method by the Republic of Korea, responsible for 22%. Additionally, both countries use fire to exterminate, where Sweden is higher than the Republic of Korea, about 20% and 9%, respectively.
Compared to both countries, the vast majority of endangerment product has been disposed of in sanitary landfill in the United Kingdom, followed by chemical treatment and dumping at sea, which is equally 8%. Last, the least used method in three countries, only 2% of junk is incinerated in the United Kingdom.
I agree that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in the younger generation.
Nowadays, with the rapid development of the economy, children are growing up in a good condition environment where they can eat foods as much as they want, which caused a rise in obesity in children. The government has the duty to control the rise in obesity in children from different aspects.
First, the government should do some public promotion to call for parents to pay attention to their child's obesity problem. With the promotion of public charity ads, more parents would control their kid's weight, as a result, the rise in obesity in children would descend.
Moreover, as a rule maker, the government has the duty to make some rules and policies to limit certain foods for children. Without those rules, children may eat foods that damage their health and increase their weight, and overall obesity rises.
Overall, the government plays an important role to control obesity in children and they are responsible.
Task 1
The pie charts illustrate the various methods applied to process waste products in the Republic of Korea , Sweden and the United Kingdom. Generally, underground burial of waste appears to be a common method of waste processing among the three countries.
The United kingdom processed a significant proportion of its waste that is 82% by underground burial. The amount of waste treated chemically and that dumped at sea was comparable at 8% while that treated by incineration was as low as 2%.It is concerning that no waste products were managed recycling.
Similarly Sweden managed a substantial amount of its waste that is 55% using the underground burial method. While recylcling and incineration methods were comparable at an estimated 25% and 20% respectively. Chemical treatment and dumping of waste materials at sea were not applied in waste management in Sweden.
On the other hand the Republic of Korea processed most of its waste products by recycling, 69% of its waste materials were recycled. Whilst only 9% were combusted and 22% buried. It is important to note that there were no waste materials dumped at sea or treated chemically in the Republic of Korea.
TASK 2
Childhood obesity has raised significant concern in various fields of science and medicine to be particular. It has been related to various early childhood chronic illnesses such as diabetes and heart disease. However, like most health challenges it is a multifaceted complication. While the government has a role to play in this intricate interaction of factors, consideration needs to be given to other contributors as well.
In many public schools in both developed and developing countries the government budget dictates the kinds of meals that are available to many children in these schools who often come from low income to middle class families. These meals account for a substantial proportion of the child's diet since children consume at least two out of the three major meals of the day at school. In the developing countries, where organic meals are more affordable than the fast food, take out and trans fat laden meals this might come as an advantage. On the contrary, in developed countries the meals high in trans fat and fast foods are more affordable. In view of the public school budget, these meals are more likely to be available to children predisposing them to obesity.
Additionally, the government has a role to play in the planning of public housing, and subsequent access to facilities such as farmers markets that provides families access to health food and play grounds that promote physical activity among children. It also determines the taxes levied on both healthy foods and the unhealthy foods that are high in sugar and trans fat thus dictating family access to such goods. Therefore government policies that increase affordability and thus family access to healthy foods can help reduce childhood obesity.
On the other hand families, schools and other communities that raise children need to acknowledge their contribution to their children's well being and thus obesity. This is because parents and care givers play a role in both choice of meals and meal preparation methods that are significant determinants of nutrient content of meals. For example giving a child meals that are heavily fried or high in sugar content and frequent unnecessary snacking poses a high risk for obesity.
Similarly these families, and communities such as schools determine the child's physical activity. The school cirricullum that provides time for sports and other extra cirricular activities for instance can be very useful in reducing the risk of child hood obesity through promoting physical activity.
In conclusion, whilst the government's role in the challenge of childhood obesity is significant, it is vital that other stakeholders in the various aspects of a child's life recognize their role in the challenge and work towards sustainable solutions.
The pie charts here present how three different countries, UK, Korea and Sweden, deal with their waste products.
Recycling is one of the different options that can be chose by governments to deal with their waste products, though just Korea has a developed recycling system that allows to reuse most of his waste (69%), Sweden in fact manage to recycle just 25% of its total whereas UK doesn't have at all recycled products.
Another common way to get free of rubbish is to put it underground, UK use this method almost in every case (82%) but also the other two countries are used to this solution, as more than half of Sweden waste are treated in this way, moreover also Korea has to dig for 22% of the waste.
In conclusion, there are also other kind of treatment that can be faced by waste products, for example incineration, which is rarely used in all the three countries or "dumping in the sea" and "chemical treatment", these ones are used only by the British.
The number of children that are suffering from obesity is constantly increasing. Many people are starting to blame the government for this occurrence. In my point of view, it is not completely true that government institution is the only one responsible for this event.
Firstly, I reckon that a big role is played by the marketing and advertising companies: this organisations get to earn a enormous quantity of money by publicising junk food (candies, chocolate, snacks, etc.) to children.
By being the mean target of these well-studied publicities, young children are the victims of this controversial manipulations.
Secondly, I believe that a big responsibility is held by the parents. They are the ones who are supposed to instruct their babies to eat consciously and take care of their body since a young age. Moreover, the parents should also try to provide healthy alternatives for common processed snacks: instead of giving your child a Mars bar as a afternoon’s treat I would strictly suggest to procure them with some fruit or an organic snack.
Summarising all the information, my final opinion is that the government is not the one to blame for the increase of the percentage of children affected by obesity: the marketing companies and the parents of the child are the ones who should take responsibility.
The pie chart above provides information about how threatening waste products are dealt in Sweden, United Kingdom and Republic of Korea.
Overall, one can notice that the usage of more eco friendly solution (Recycling and Underground) are more preferred than other techniques that can provoke a negative impact on the ecosystem of the planet.
The Republic of Korean mostly deals with dangerous waste through recycling (almost two thirds). 22% of the radioactive garbage is buried underground and 9% destroyed by fire.
Sweden is the country that makes most usage of the underground to get rid of its threatening detritus (55%). The second most used technique is recycling (25%) while the least practiced is incineration (less than a fourth)
The United Kingdom is the only country which makes usage of chemical treatment (8%) and the practice of dumping the garbage in the sea (8%). More that three quarters of the dangerous waste is buried underground while one a small fraction (2%) in incinerated. A surprising date is that recycling in not used.
Task 1
The Pie Charts illustrate how dangerous waste products are dealt with in the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Overall, it shows that all three countries have different approaches towards clearing hazardous waste products. With underground burying, recycling, and incineration being common approaches in all three countries.
In the Republic of Korea, recycling waste for after-use is the most used approach with 69%, while underground shoveling is in the second place with 22%, then in the final place is the approach of destroying waste by fire with 9%.
In Sweden, shoveling dangerous waste underground is the most used method at 55%, a quarter of products are dealt with recycling, while 20% of dangerous waste products are destroyed by burning them with fire.
In The UK, burying dangerous waste products is the most used method by far with 82%, then chemical treatment and dumping at sea, are the second most used methods, both at 8% and finally, Incineration is the least used method with 2%.
Task01:
The world has developed very fast in the last time and this progress in different fields of life creates new problems and we can guess that life will never satisfy from evolving.
However, The countries are variant when we talk about the weather and sources like fuel, solids, etc, automatically there is a change in the consumption of society in different domains, and from those domains, electricity, Electricity is one of the complex systems we deal with and he attracts in a different field to help optimize the system near and near to the ideal state, from this field electrical engineering in general and control theory, computer science, Artificial intelligence, economy, internet of things...etc.Further, power systems construct into three parts production, transmission, and distribution, if we take a look into production which is a huge subject and there is big research I think it will not finish because of the need for sources like fuels, renewable energy, from the result we have the UK have underground dominant and also a small part of other like chemical treatment dumping sea and incineration when we take the Sweden we see also the underground with 55% and the recycling and incineration, and the Republic of Korea the dominant source is the recycling and other things
In conclusion, the Republic of Korea is the best country among these three because of using recycling which is mean they don't use sources, and maybe that refers to population reason or economics.
Task02:
The world has changed very fast in the last few years in different fields of life and this makes some new problems where we need frequently work to optimize our life and teach our children how to do it, from the time we were dealing with the poverty and the need of food and now we have everything near to us, so we have a new problem is the eat healthily and know what our body needs to balance our eating and this need to be able in all life the person.
However, Today we have a passion for critic the government I think in all countries this was a trend, on the other hand, we forget that the government gives us the area of freedom to do anything we want approximately and in this free space we follow our ignorance and put all the causes on the responsible and also forget that those who work in the ministry or any head of part of the nation are just us or one from the family and friends, we should also consider that not every weighted have the obesity patient maybe its a genomic patient.
In conclusion, My opinion is against those people who say the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children, and the problem refers to the parents and all family members because it is in the hand of the child and no one will be tired in his life just himself and the children must help him and show the right way because he did not yet know the life and mechanism of human life, v
https://ieltsonlinetests.com/wot/result/writing-practice-test-1-934717
PLEASE GIVE A FEEDBACK. CAN I GET A 6.5 BAND FOR THIS??